Talk:Topfreedom

Wikipedia is not censored.
Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Topfreedom was copied or moved into Toplessness with this edit on 2011-12-05. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Nudity Mid‑importance

	Nudity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nudity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of nudity and naturism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NudityWikipedia:WikiProject NudityTemplate:WikiProject Nuditynudity articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Feminism Mid‑importance

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Gender studies Low‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : see Unassessed Gender studies articles and Unknown-importance Gender studies articles
Cleanup : edit to see
Collaborate : see /Collaboration
Copyedit : edit to see
Deletion sorting : see /Sexuality and gender
Expand : edit to see
Infobox : see Gender studies articles needing infoboxes
Merge : edit to see
Notability : edit to see
NPOV : edit to see
Orphans : Brannon Masculinity Scale · Holy Virility · Media and gender · Michael Kaufman (author) · Women's education in Saudi Arabia
Photo : see Wikipedia requested photographs of gender studies
Split : History of feminism
Stubs : see Gender studies stubs
Translate : see /translation
Update : edit to see
Verify : Riot grrrl
Needs attention : see Gender studies articles needing attention

Archives

Globalize

Please consider globalize game this article. I’ve removed the orange box warning template because this issue in this article does not create any danger to the reader. Anybody can see that it’s about the geographic areas mentioned in the table of contents. The warning box is an example of tag bombing. Jehochman ^Talk 03:10, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

news article re. recent MN incident

I don't really have time to go through it right now, so am posting it so others can to see if there's anything worthwhile to add to the Wiki article. https://www.twincities.com/2019/07/10/cops-called-when-woman-goes-topless-at-duluth-beach-but-was-she-breaking-the-law/ Phantom in ca (talk) 21:29, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Loss at New Hampshire Supreme Court appealing to US Supreme Court

For someone to add to the main article. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7379311/Free-Nipple-activists-want-Supreme-Court-declare-local-topless-ban-unconstitutional.html Phantom in ca (talk) 01:33, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The US Supreme Court docket page for this case is: https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/19-64.html

The next pending action is a written argument by the state of New Hampshire due on Nov. 14th, but is asking for an extension of time. Phantom in ca (talk) 01:21, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Today the US Supreme Court denied hearing their appeal. (See p.4 at: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/011320zor_4fc5.pdf) This effectively leaves in place the lower court's (i.e., NH Sup Ct) decision. Phantom in ca (talk) 17:11, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Dan Hynes, who represented the women, said he was disappointed. They are considering their next option, he said, including filing for relief in federal court and asking the New Hampshire legislature 'to make it clear that towns and cities lack the authority to create violations of law involving someone's sex.'" From: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7882215/Justices-turn-away-appeal-women-went-topless-beach.html The latter seems like something that should happen in California! Phantom in ca (talk) 20:42, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

USA: Utah state criminal prosecution under lewdness vs federal appeals court topfreedom win

This is a case to watch. Tilli Buchanan, a 27 yo UT stepmom and her husband took off their tops inside their garage after doing some physical labor. Her 3 step kids saw her. Their mother reported it to their social worker who reported it to the police. Charges have been filed. Trial is set to begin 2019 Nov 19. Her attorney will use the 10th Circuit federal win against Fort Collins in her defense. https://www.sltrib.com/news/2019/09/30/this-utah-woman-was/ Phantom in ca (talk) 20:12, 11 October 2019 (UTC) The hearing was yesterday. The state judge says she expects to issue a written ruling in about 2 months. https://www.sltrib.com/news/2019/11/20/utah-judge-will-decide/ Phantom in ca (talk) 20:03, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Colorado woman cited for going topless awarded $50G settlement"

https://www.foxnews.com/us/colorado-woman-cited-topless-awarded-50g-settlement https://denver.cbslocal.com/2019/11/08/effie-krokos-topless-loveland-settlement/ Phantom in ca (talk) 02:12, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Topfreedom confusion in Oklahoma

Here's 2 news articles re. topfreedom in OK after the federal circuit court win. Topfreedom for Sand Springs: https://www.tulsaworld.com/communities/sandsprings/topless-but-not-obscene-is-ok-for-sand-springs-police/article_8db555f7-bf41-5cf9-a6ba-38112cd4ea67.html Just going topless is okay, but no lewdness or obscenity. Continued discrimination for Tulsa: https://www.tulsaworld.com/news/tulsa-police-will-resume-enforcing-ban-on-women-going-topless/article_9c8ba1e3-bea4-5171-9196-95027146860b.html This post is in case someone wants to add this info to main article. Phantom in ca (talk) 06:16, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Germany 2021

c:Category:Protest by the »Hedonistische Internationale - Sektion Wilde Möpse« in Berlin-Kreuzberg, Mariannenplatz, in support of topfreedom after an incident at the Plansche playground --C.Suthorn (talk) 04:17, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Taiwan

The Taiwan section in inappropriately sourced (only primary online sources of dubious quality/reliability), which leads to notability and possibly correctness of that section being unclear.--Kmhkmh (talk) 21:55, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]